<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impactist: New Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/</link>
	<description>Motionographer shares the best in design and moving media, from student work to feature films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:14:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aspect</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>aspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>some more tech stuff please........
did you shoot RAW or JPEG....?
what camera 1D MKII.....?
what frame rate 5fps or 8.5fps....?
would be cool  to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some more tech stuff please&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
did you shoot RAW or JPEG&#8230;.?<br />
what camera 1D MKII&#8230;..?<br />
what frame rate 5fps or 8.5fps&#8230;.?<br />
would be cool  to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>probably one of my all time favorite spots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably one of my all time favorite spots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kinetics</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>kinetics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Kelly and Daniel,

Did you use the Canon EOS 1D Mark II N? I ask because of the high frame rate it shoots at. I have used the 1DS-Mark II but not the &quot;N&quot; and wonder what frame rate you shot at since 4fps did not give me the same level of smoothness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly and Daniel,</p>
<p>Did you use the Canon EOS 1D Mark II N? I ask because of the high frame rate it shoots at. I have used the 1DS-Mark II but not the &#8220;N&#8221; and wonder what frame rate you shot at since 4fps did not give me the same level of smoothness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motoxpress</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>motoxpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your help, dude :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your help, dude <img src='http://motionographer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rothermel</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>rothermel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>extrapolate more on the process?  

dude, just preplan the shots you want and hold down a trigger to your camera as you dolly around them, or whatever.  its the same process as shooting video, just gives you a different more stop motion approach.  its not a groundbreaking idea, just executed well.

if you can&#039;t figure out how they did this, you might wanna take some super basic photography or video classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>extrapolate more on the process?  </p>
<p>dude, just preplan the shots you want and hold down a trigger to your camera as you dolly around them, or whatever.  its the same process as shooting video, just gives you a different more stop motion approach.  its not a groundbreaking idea, just executed well.</p>
<p>if you can&#8217;t figure out how they did this, you might wanna take some super basic photography or video classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motoxpress</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>motoxpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>Wow. I was floored when I found out the &quot;Corpse Bride&quot; was photographed with DSLRs but that was stop motion. I am hoping you can extrapolate more on the process...eager to experiment now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I was floored when I found out the &#8220;Corpse Bride&#8221; was photographed with DSLRs but that was stop motion. I am hoping you can extrapolate more on the process&#8230;eager to experiment now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>&quot;In total, over 14,000 stills were shot over two days at eight different locations around New York City.&quot;

Whoa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In total, over 14,000 stills were shot over two days at eight different locations around New York City.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whoa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelly_and_daniel</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>kelly_and_daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice notes.  Sounds like clarification of the project may be helpful, at least as far as the technique goes.

We shot using a digital SLR for a number of reasons.  First off, the resolution.  The project was finished in HD, so of course we&#039;d need greater than HD frame size.  This huge frame also was neccessary for realignment since it was all hand held to achieve the end result where we&#039;d be able to recompose within the frame.

There was no tracking software used, no plugin trickery.  The majority of the work involved frame by frame painting and reconstruction of images.  A custom solution was developed and tested prior to the actual production.  No motion footage was used, everything was captured using the digital SLR.

In total, over 14,000 stills were shot over two days at eight different locations around New York City.

Hope that helped to make a little more sense of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice notes.  Sounds like clarification of the project may be helpful, at least as far as the technique goes.</p>
<p>We shot using a digital SLR for a number of reasons.  First off, the resolution.  The project was finished in HD, so of course we&#8217;d need greater than HD frame size.  This huge frame also was neccessary for realignment since it was all hand held to achieve the end result where we&#8217;d be able to recompose within the frame.</p>
<p>There was no tracking software used, no plugin trickery.  The majority of the work involved frame by frame painting and reconstruction of images.  A custom solution was developed and tested prior to the actual production.  No motion footage was used, everything was captured using the digital SLR.</p>
<p>In total, over 14,000 stills were shot over two days at eight different locations around New York City.</p>
<p>Hope that helped to make a little more sense of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willi</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>willi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>that was really great. can someone explain to me the still image thing? it really just looks like dv with effects on it. for example the guy outside slapping high-fives with his buds- that&#039;s comprised of stills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was really great. can someone explain to me the still image thing? it really just looks like dv with effects on it. for example the guy outside slapping high-fives with his buds- that&#8217;s comprised of stills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauloblob</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/comment-page-1/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>pauloblob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/09/25/impactist-new-work/#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Wow... great!! Do you think they used aftfx timeward to give the slow on the footages??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; great!! Do you think they used aftfx timeward to give the slow on the footages??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
