<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renascent: Lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/</link>
	<description>Motionographer shares the best in design and moving media, from student work to feature films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:09:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Supernova</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Supernova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Not so impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Monkey</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>D O P E ! ! !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D O P E ! ! !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deathtoprint</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>deathtoprint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionographer.com/2006/10/10/renascent-lost/#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>Joost never fails to impress me, I&#039;ve been a huge fan of his work for a while. The simplicity of this piece compared to his other 3D work is still enlightening. He is a master of timebased type, and the audio on this piece (although not composed by him) fits perfectly. 

I&#039;d like to know which was done first, the audio, or the motion, either way, it works perfectly. 

The storm in the middle where the text comes out is cool too... simple, but effective. 

Kinda makes me wonder how he planned this in his workspace, 3 seperate comps? or one big one w/ temporary masks? I hardly know my way around after fx, so... id like to know. 

time to head over to mograph.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joost never fails to impress me, I&#8217;ve been a huge fan of his work for a while. The simplicity of this piece compared to his other 3D work is still enlightening. He is a master of timebased type, and the audio on this piece (although not composed by him) fits perfectly. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know which was done first, the audio, or the motion, either way, it works perfectly. </p>
<p>The storm in the middle where the text comes out is cool too&#8230; simple, but effective. </p>
<p>Kinda makes me wonder how he planned this in his workspace, 3 seperate comps? or one big one w/ temporary masks? I hardly know my way around after fx, so&#8230; id like to know. </p>
<p>time to head over to mograph.net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
