New U2 video pieced together nicely
Check out this second video for U2’s “Window in the Skies”, directed by Jonas Odell via Nexus Productions in London and pieced together along with the crew at Filmteknarna in Stockholm. The images were scanned in from the new “U2 on U2″ book, cut up and pieced together to create this incredibly dynamic 3D journey. I knew as soon as this piece started I was going to like it because I was ready and willing to sit through a U2 video…
Thanks to Seth for passing on the video and information!
Thursday, January 11th 2007 at 8:39 pm |
great piece
Thursday, January 11th 2007 at 11:41 pm |
What an excellent job they did with that video! It’s particularly relevant to me as I’m about to embark toward a similar style.
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 12:21 am |
Would like to know more details about how this was pieced together..what’s involved, and so on…any takers?
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 12:27 am |
i kinda like the video that the mill did for that song more
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 7:22 am |
ugh. u2
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 7:33 am |
“Would like to know more details about how this was pieced together..what’s involved, and so on…any takers?”
usually involves building rough 3d geometry of your photo, projecting the photo onto said geometry, do your camera move, and then fix up those places where the texture smears or where you manually have to fill in background information that wasnt in the original photograph.
whole video reminds me of gondrys rolling stone video. just… cleaner and soulless. probably just cause i hate bono
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 9:43 am |
While i like the beginning i thought the rest was rather ugly & flat. Windows flying through space, eh?
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 9:56 am |
Forgive me if I’m mistaken, but a lot of it could have been done in a program such as After Effects using 3D layers. A lot of photos can be faked into looking 3D fairly easily (I’ve seen it done on A&E). There’s a section (1:20-1:28) that they cut people from the backgrounds, and instead of patching the backround back together with photoshop, they lit the layers as if the cut out was the shadow. A lot of that was genious. I especially like the way the reflections in the water were handled. It looks as if they duplicated the layer, gave it a negative x-scale value and put the image containing the water between the two layers with the water knocked out (look at 2:28). That’s how I would have done it, but of course there are many, many ways to accomplish it.
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 9:58 am |
Oops. I meant a negative y-scale value. Sorry!
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 1:39 pm |
how inaccurate! and you call yourself a motionographer poster!
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 2:31 pm |
Love it except for the fact that it has so soul. I was bored by the end. Still though, amazing camera move.
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 4:23 pm |
You guys must be jaded. That video is amazing. I couldnt imagine how long it took. I guess U2 does have the funds to hire 100 or so people to cutout images of them and their album covers.
Anyways great video it deserves to be seen.
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 4:38 pm |
I really liked this piece.
As for my guess on how it was done would be a combination of AE and a 3d program… As some of the elements do have depth and aren’t flat. Personally I would have done it all in C4D as it would be very quick for me to compose the scenes and make adjustments fairly fast… I bet all the roto took the longest…
Friday, January 12th 2007 at 9:16 pm |
It probably was some true 3D, but I do think it could have been accomplished without any 3D modeling.
Saturday, January 13th 2007 at 1:11 am |
I agree with Joe Clay..its amazing what one can do JUST with AE..in fact I’d be EVEN more intrigued to find the logistics of the project IF ITS ENTIRELY BUILT in AFter Effects with layering and 3d camera..But what I’m interested to know is the scope on the whole…i.e. time vs budget constrains vs this vs that, what was the decision made with regards to how much of it was 3d and how much of it was 2D..
For some reason what ‘anonymouse’ said seems to make more sense cuz then you can do a rough playblast and make sure the movement etc are all smooth before you start patching it up and glossing it over.
Saturday, January 13th 2007 at 11:43 am |
The technique reminds me that Moby piece. All of them are really nice.
http://elmaaltshift.blogspot.com/2006/07/moby-slipping-away.html
And also check these links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuoljANz4EA&eurl=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl4rwMZWATs&eurl=
http://www.cmu.edu/PR/releases06/060613_3d.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuoljANz4EA
Monday, January 15th 2007 at 1:12 pm |
great video, great song, great band.
Friday, January 19th 2007 at 10:17 am |
I hear it was done in 4weeks.
working day and night with a team of 8 and done in AFX.
Budget was very low. as always with musicvideos.
Friday, January 19th 2007 at 2:45 pm |
The video was entirely built in AE with 3D layers, no real 3D involved.
Friday, January 19th 2007 at 3:38 pm |
I emailed a list of all your questions to Jonas, so we’ll figure this mystery out soon