<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Wow! That&#8217;s pretty &#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link> <description>Motionographer shares the best in moving media, from student work to feature films.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: the doctor</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-12505</link> <dc:creator>the doctor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-12505</guid> <description>i think people are referring more to the design of the logo, not the animation. i prefer simple logo resolves too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think people are referring more to the design of the logo, not the animation. i prefer simple logo resolves too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jdv</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-12458</link> <dc:creator>jdv</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:41:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-12458</guid> <description>Just wanna challenge the logo comments a bit here... Yeah, in and of itself there is nothing impressive going on, but why does every logo resolve have to be it&#039;s own big production? A big, swirly, fancy logo resolve seems to be the convention at the moment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanna challenge the logo comments a bit here&#8230; Yeah, in and of itself there is nothing impressive going on, but why does every logo resolve have to be it&#8217;s own big production? A big, swirly, fancy logo resolve seems to be the convention at the moment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the doctor</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-12342</link> <dc:creator>the doctor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-12342</guid> <description>i liked it. white square logo is cheap though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i liked it. white square logo is cheap though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: podmonger</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link> <dc:creator>podmonger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:05:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11821</guid> <description>... but conceptually, it&#039;s good. A single concept: &quot;see how it feels&quot;.
Now that begs for submissions from different firms, wouldn&#039;t you think? How would other firms treat the concept?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; but conceptually, it&#8217;s good. A single concept: &#8220;see how it feels&#8221;.</p><p>Now that begs for submissions from different firms, wouldn&#8217;t you think? How would other firms treat the concept?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11813</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11813</guid> <description>Eh, not so impressive.  Looks like someone was having fun with a new Kai&#039;s Plugin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, not so impressive.  Looks like someone was having fun with a new Kai&#8217;s Plugin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: KMFIX</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11800</link> <dc:creator>KMFIX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11800</guid> <description>mmmm...purdy...
thought the music was nice too...
i&#039;m gonna spend some time trying to figure out some of that stuff...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmm&#8230;purdy&#8230;</p><p>thought the music was nice too&#8230;</p><p>i&#8217;m gonna spend some time trying to figure out some of that stuff&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ramin</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11779</link> <dc:creator>Ramin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11779</guid> <description>It looks nice, but it reminds me  of a media player  visualisation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice, but it reminds me  of a media player  visualisation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anonymouse</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11762</link> <dc:creator>anonymouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11762</guid> <description>richard baily meets 70s disco.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard baily meets 70s disco.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tosh</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11673</link> <dc:creator>tosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11673</guid> <description>i agree with the first comment, the logo resolve totally fucks it. looks like it was slung on in power point.
some nice in camera stuff though!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with the first comment, the logo resolve totally fucks it. looks like it was slung on in power point.<br
/> some nice in camera stuff though!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daniel</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/comment-page-1/#comment-11547</link> <dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:47:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2007/02/14/wow-thats-pretty/#comment-11547</guid> <description>might have been shakira</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>might have been shakira</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
