<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lobo for Zune</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/</link>
	<description>Motionographer shares the best in design and moving media, from student work to feature films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:29:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THA_DON</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31787</link>
		<dc:creator>THA_DON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31787</guid>
		<description>sc... maybe you are smoking a little early today? but i would say 47 frames per second?

after watching this twice i am still wondering who did this? could it be lobo? wow.

tits: birds that fly out as the camera swoops by for no apparent reason is the in thing, been for a while, look at Superfad&#039;s target thing, and stardust&#039;s gold/green presidentti thing. dare you look at where this particular species of bird made one of its first debuts... psyop&#039;s bombay. its as if its this one bird thats made a career move to mograph. your lucky he is not carrying a camera or leaving a trail of wispy, magic butterflies with golden dust sprinkling and twinkling in the light for good measure, although this one did get the vector trailing/leading ribbon.
dont hate, appreciate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sc&#8230; maybe you are smoking a little early today? but i would say 47 frames per second?</p>
<p>after watching this twice i am still wondering who did this? could it be lobo? wow.</p>
<p>tits: birds that fly out as the camera swoops by for no apparent reason is the in thing, been for a while, look at Superfad&#8217;s target thing, and stardust&#8217;s gold/green presidentti thing. dare you look at where this particular species of bird made one of its first debuts&#8230; psyop&#8217;s bombay. its as if its this one bird thats made a career move to mograph. your lucky he is not carrying a camera or leaving a trail of wispy, magic butterflies with golden dust sprinkling and twinkling in the light for good measure, although this one did get the vector trailing/leading ribbon.<br />
dont hate, appreciate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tits</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31776</link>
		<dc:creator>tits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31776</guid>
		<description>&quot;have been willing to motion graphics and its ability as a medium to communicate their message.&quot; 

And what message is that?

Based on this current promo I don&#039;t see any message or idea, besides the usual cliched images of customers enjoying products, and wait for it....a hawk riding on a sound wave. Thats so brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;have been willing to motion graphics and its ability as a medium to communicate their message.&#8221; </p>
<p>And what message is that?</p>
<p>Based on this current promo I don&#8217;t see any message or idea, besides the usual cliched images of customers enjoying products, and wait for it&#8230;.a hawk riding on a sound wave. Thats so brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31773</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31773</guid>
		<description>the framerate on this looked higher than usual...anyone else notice that???
like maybe 40 or 60, or variable...is that even possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the framerate on this looked higher than usual&#8230;anyone else notice that???<br />
like maybe 40 or 60, or variable&#8230;is that even possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freebertbrown</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31772</link>
		<dc:creator>freebertbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31772</guid>
		<description>and what&#039;s with that big farting trumpet thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what&#8217;s with that big farting trumpet thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barret</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31767</link>
		<dc:creator>barret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31767</guid>
		<description>wow - is this a sign of the end of the days? A Lobo spot being criticized!

It would be really nice to know a &quot;insider&quot; view of the project - someone from Lobo could comment on creative freedom, execution idea, and stuff like that. As commented, despite of looking good it still looks too average for Lobo standards. Remember the old DuPont project? That&#039;s the Lobo we all know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8211; is this a sign of the end of the days? A Lobo spot being criticized!</p>
<p>It would be really nice to know a &#8220;insider&#8221; view of the project &#8211; someone from Lobo could comment on creative freedom, execution idea, and stuff like that. As commented, despite of looking good it still looks too average for Lobo standards. Remember the old DuPont project? That&#8217;s the Lobo we all know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaptorRed</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31764</link>
		<dc:creator>RaptorRed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31764</guid>
		<description>I agree with the above two posts.  This is boring.  The design is trendy but not even cool.  Just elements of cool.  The 3d stroke flying around seems to have poor timing and poor fades and animation.

The eagle animation is stiff and lifeless.  Further more I&#039;m pretty tired of seeing solid 3d animals that glow or something in these things.  Stardust and Psyop did it much better and they were prettier and felt like glittery pretty creatures.  This is just dead.  Like a zombie.  Again another element of tried and true cool.

Unoriginal and technically underachieving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the above two posts.  This is boring.  The design is trendy but not even cool.  Just elements of cool.  The 3d stroke flying around seems to have poor timing and poor fades and animation.</p>
<p>The eagle animation is stiff and lifeless.  Further more I&#8217;m pretty tired of seeing solid 3d animals that glow or something in these things.  Stardust and Psyop did it much better and they were prettier and felt like glittery pretty creatures.  This is just dead.  Like a zombie.  Again another element of tried and true cool.</p>
<p>Unoriginal and technically underachieving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iline</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31761</link>
		<dc:creator>iline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31761</guid>
		<description>You know, this is standard-fare motion graphics - as in the past three years graphic trends amalgamated into one spot. 

It&#039;s nice - and none of this looks particularly easy - but if you were to raid the 3D asset archives of any of the top three mograph houses, I&#039;d bet you could conjure up similar. It looks like the kind of client-pleasing pitch that I&#039;d submit if I was asked to work for Microsoft with relative creative freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, this is standard-fare motion graphics &#8211; as in the past three years graphic trends amalgamated into one spot. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice &#8211; and none of this looks particularly easy &#8211; but if you were to raid the 3D asset archives of any of the top three mograph houses, I&#8217;d bet you could conjure up similar. It looks like the kind of client-pleasing pitch that I&#8217;d submit if I was asked to work for Microsoft with relative creative freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc B.</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31753</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31753</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Simon. I&#039;m a big fan of lobo. And it&#039;s sorta painful to see this, because i know how great their work usually is. This here is a disappointment in many aspects.
I wish i&#039;d be cheering though. Maybe i can just try to be slightly constructive in my criticism. 

The design and animation looks unusually cheap to lobos standards. The 3d and animation looks like off the shelf models with ambient occlusion and the timing and pacing itself is random and chaotic. It&#039;s mostly just generic looking 3d models moving through space. And it&#039;s mising anything that could be called innovative or carefully crafted. More like a student piece from many years ago.
Could it be that there wasn&#039;t enough money so they let their juniors run on this one?

Good luck to lobo though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Simon. I&#8217;m a big fan of lobo. And it&#8217;s sorta painful to see this, because i know how great their work usually is. This here is a disappointment in many aspects.<br />
I wish i&#8217;d be cheering though. Maybe i can just try to be slightly constructive in my criticism. </p>
<p>The design and animation looks unusually cheap to lobos standards. The 3d and animation looks like off the shelf models with ambient occlusion and the timing and pacing itself is random and chaotic. It&#8217;s mostly just generic looking 3d models moving through space. And it&#8217;s mising anything that could be called innovative or carefully crafted. More like a student piece from many years ago.<br />
Could it be that there wasn&#8217;t enough money so they let their juniors run on this one?</p>
<p>Good luck to lobo though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ochyming</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31750</link>
		<dc:creator>ochyming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31750</guid>
		<description>HUG?
Money buys anything, even free  willing.
But that is not a bad thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HUG?<br />
Money buys anything, even free  willing.<br />
But that is not a bad thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noideaisoriginal</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/comment-page-1/#comment-31749</link>
		<dc:creator>Noideaisoriginal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/2008/01/13/lobo-for-zune/#comment-31749</guid>
		<description>DOPE! I also &#039;got&#039; the message(s) on the first watch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOPE! I also &#8216;got&#8217; the message(s) on the first watch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
