<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lacoste: Past, Present and Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/</link>
	<description>Motionographer shares the best in design and moving media, from student work to feature films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:29:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33391</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33391</guid>
		<description>Lacoste&#039;s future vision of tennis looks more like a game of braille squash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lacoste&#8217;s future vision of tennis looks more like a game of braille squash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpeter</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33331</link>
		<dc:creator>mrpeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33331</guid>
		<description>The editor only speaks for himself. THe reason this piece is unsuccessful isnt the 2D/3D thing. Its poor art direction. The costume (yes costume) looks as about as authentic as technicolor. And the direction is mindless and contrived. The tagline is stale and predictable and the payoff is minimal. Its cool that you like this. But because others dont, you shouldnt chalk one up to &quot;Everyone agrees with the editor&quot; - mrp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The editor only speaks for himself. THe reason this piece is unsuccessful isnt the 2D/3D thing. Its poor art direction. The costume (yes costume) looks as about as authentic as technicolor. And the direction is mindless and contrived. The tagline is stale and predictable and the payoff is minimal. Its cool that you like this. But because others dont, you shouldnt chalk one up to &#8220;Everyone agrees with the editor&#8221; &#8211; mrp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Santic</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Santic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33303</guid>
		<description>Actually I like it... a lot. I appreciate an opinion but more or less here everybody just agrees with an editor. The most of the motion today is just After Effects flat 2d/3d graphic and this particular example is still minor part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I like it&#8230; a lot. I appreciate an opinion but more or less here everybody just agrees with an editor. The most of the motion today is just After Effects flat 2d/3d graphic and this particular example is still minor part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpez2000</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33266</link>
		<dc:creator>xpez2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33266</guid>
		<description>I dont think gravity will change in the future.

You know this is a MOGRAPH forum when all of the comments and criticism are about the technique and style and nothing about storytelling and emotion.

pshhh. digital artists...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think gravity will change in the future.</p>
<p>You know this is a MOGRAPH forum when all of the comments and criticism are about the technique and style and nothing about storytelling and emotion.</p>
<p>pshhh. digital artists&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHR</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33248</link>
		<dc:creator>MHR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33248</guid>
		<description>Technically its pretty good, but stylistically... as noted vociferously, stale.

In terms of the sport, there are other reasons to dismiss spots not actually portraying the action/rules (esp. if you play them).  I would never have picked up tennis like this.  Actually, it looks like they&#039;re depicting racquetball more than tennis - though, this would make sense since nobody would have time to react to a 238mph serve.  Additionally, the serve - called a &#039;Jamaican Jump serve&#039; - rarely works; no control/accuracy.  Again, I suppose that&#039;s why the artist favors playing against a wall instead of another CG human.

To draw the desired response from your audience in this aesthetic, I would think applying real world scenarios to the futuristic style would be more successful - not completely abandoning what you&#039;re audience knows.  Looking back, I suppose that&#039;s why some artists&#039; depictions of futurism are more memorable than others, because they adhere to their era&#039;s &#039;rules&#039;.

Again, technically sound, but all in all, this does kind of date the brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically its pretty good, but stylistically&#8230; as noted vociferously, stale.</p>
<p>In terms of the sport, there are other reasons to dismiss spots not actually portraying the action/rules (esp. if you play them).  I would never have picked up tennis like this.  Actually, it looks like they&#8217;re depicting racquetball more than tennis &#8211; though, this would make sense since nobody would have time to react to a 238mph serve.  Additionally, the serve &#8211; called a &#8216;Jamaican Jump serve&#8217; &#8211; rarely works; no control/accuracy.  Again, I suppose that&#8217;s why the artist favors playing against a wall instead of another CG human.</p>
<p>To draw the desired response from your audience in this aesthetic, I would think applying real world scenarios to the futuristic style would be more successful &#8211; not completely abandoning what you&#8217;re audience knows.  Looking back, I suppose that&#8217;s why some artists&#8217; depictions of futurism are more memorable than others, because they adhere to their era&#8217;s &#8216;rules&#8217;.</p>
<p>Again, technically sound, but all in all, this does kind of date the brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrpeter</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33243</link>
		<dc:creator>mrpeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33243</guid>
		<description>this spot is beat. Everything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this spot is beat. Everything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33238</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33238</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly the question I was asking with the post. Why go futuristic in the first place? There&#039;s no point—except that every other sports label seems to be doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly the question I was asking with the post. Why go futuristic in the first place? There&#8217;s no point—except that every other sports label seems to be doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Ma</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33235</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33235</guid>
		<description>Err... i don&#039;t find it appealing. (I watched the video).

The concept is weak without support to me, as I don&#039;t understand why tennis become &quot;single-play&quot; and not to &quot;compete&quot; with others in the future, I think of people who play Nintendo Wii.

I feel the tennis player is kind of furious man for fight, or look like more than a Ninja. And why rely on the eye-mask for ball position? Is our sight becomes deteriorate that rely on those &quot;technology&quot; in the future, it is so pity for the future human development.

I would like to talk more, what is the &quot;fun&quot; if tennis is just play by single, and with the help of the &quot;eye-mask&quot;, I think he never miss a ball and he is just keep swinging the racket until he use up all his energy. That is no fun at all because there&#039;s just a perfect play with no mistake.

(At least WHY there&#039;s no rival introduced? No interaction, really boring to me as the concept is weak.)

I think I would like to express, the character didn&#039;t pass the Uncanny Valley (although the animation part feedback is quite convinced from the threads, comment by the others).

I think it is quite stupid for the creator of the animation, Why cover his mouth with the mask, because no emotional and expression, he turns into a ROBOT. With the perfect playing, It is just lack of persuasion for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err&#8230; i don&#8217;t find it appealing. (I watched the video).</p>
<p>The concept is weak without support to me, as I don&#8217;t understand why tennis become &#8220;single-play&#8221; and not to &#8220;compete&#8221; with others in the future, I think of people who play Nintendo Wii.</p>
<p>I feel the tennis player is kind of furious man for fight, or look like more than a Ninja. And why rely on the eye-mask for ball position? Is our sight becomes deteriorate that rely on those &#8220;technology&#8221; in the future, it is so pity for the future human development.</p>
<p>I would like to talk more, what is the &#8220;fun&#8221; if tennis is just play by single, and with the help of the &#8220;eye-mask&#8221;, I think he never miss a ball and he is just keep swinging the racket until he use up all his energy. That is no fun at all because there&#8217;s just a perfect play with no mistake.</p>
<p>(At least WHY there&#8217;s no rival introduced? No interaction, really boring to me as the concept is weak.)</p>
<p>I think I would like to express, the character didn&#8217;t pass the Uncanny Valley (although the animation part feedback is quite convinced from the threads, comment by the others).</p>
<p>I think it is quite stupid for the creator of the animation, Why cover his mouth with the mask, because no emotional and expression, he turns into a ROBOT. With the perfect playing, It is just lack of persuasion for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martz</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33234</link>
		<dc:creator>martz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33234</guid>
		<description>yeah i think there are two futures, the uber sterile luxury future(lacoste), and dirt style/blade runner/mad max future, if you really like the second one you should have posted this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeW73hv1_ew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i think there are two futures, the uber sterile luxury future(lacoste), and dirt style/blade runner/mad max future, if you really like the second one you should have posted this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeW73hv1_ew" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeW73hv1_ew</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boca</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/05/20/lacoste-past-present-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33230</link>
		<dc:creator>boca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3535#comment-33230</guid>
		<description>Haha, hooray!
Epic day on Motionographer, Marc B. and Simon finally agreed on something!
I like it more when you disagree though, but that&#039;s just me...:D
Boca

p.s: Agreed with both of ya, a &quot;Lacoste Blade Runner&quot; would be so much better, I can even picture it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, hooray!<br />
Epic day on Motionographer, Marc B. and Simon finally agreed on something!<br />
I like it more when you disagree though, but that&#8217;s just me&#8230;:D<br />
Boca</p>
<p>p.s: Agreed with both of ya, a &#8220;Lacoste Blade Runner&#8221; would be so much better, I can even picture it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
