Comments on: Cisma: Handmade

By: blumonk

blumonk — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:42:08 +0000

its beautiful
sometimes slow is better..

By: Marc B.

Marc B. — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:26 +0000

There are some nice moments. But over all it is a tad boring and not necessarily because it’s slow.

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:35:17 +0000

that was awesome man.
Loved the tea scene. Brilliant metaphor.
Hats off.

By: john

john — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:17:38 +0000

I agree with you. I’m sick and tired of this ultra-fast-motion-graphics selling something or whatever. This is much better than any nike or zune spot. Anyway, very good cisma, can’t wait to see next one. I heard is going to be freaky…

By: Firoz

Firoz — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:51:56 +0000

This is just a general comment about slow vs faster-paced pieces.

I think that if people were watching this short in the cinema they may possibly not find it as slow as when watching it on a computer.
Why? In the cinema – there are no other distractions – you’re there to specifically watch what’s on the big screen.

On the computer, you probably interrupted whatever you were doing to watch this short, once the short is over, you’ll return to whatever you were doing.

So I think we all tend to be a little more impatient when watching online than when we are at the cinema.

By: PK

PK — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:24:39 +0000

We used zeiss 1.3 prime lenses and the camera was the arri SrIII super 16.

By: df

df — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:25:39 +0000

scc sexy

By: zeniamai

zeniamai — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:15:44 +0000

Its strangely and poetically beautiful…

By: JR

JR — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:19:16 +0000

awesome..

By: Cisma

Cisma — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:18:00 +0000

lovefoxxx is good friend of mine. I had no money at all to make it so Ive called friends to help. Even so you have to pay for the food, the film, the light. I’ve spent around 6k dollars to make it.