Comments on: No Lights, No Camera, Action… http://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss Motionographer shares the best in moving media, from student work to feature films. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:13:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: xpez2000http://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34942 xpez2000 Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:03:45 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34942 its a futile act to try and pin down lyrics and visuals... Although there are visual references in the song that seem a little verbatim to the lyrics, I don't think it's tiresome or boring. The fragile quality of Thom Yorke's voice works well with the transient nature of the imagery. That synchronous abstract relationship, is what makes this a strong video. its a futile act to try and pin down lyrics and visuals…

Although there are visual references in the song that seem a little verbatim to the lyrics, I don’t think it’s tiresome or boring.

The fragile quality of Thom Yorke’s voice works well with the transient nature of the imagery.

That synchronous abstract relationship, is what makes this a strong video.

]]> By: xpez2000http://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34941 xpez2000 Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:56:31 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34941 the problem with interactive filmmaking with multiple POVs that let user define it themselves is that it puts too much control in the users hand. they will not be able to create an editorial experience that matches one that was labored over for weeks and months. when there is no clear objective to accomplish with a interactive experience the experience soon becomes like wandering around in a ghost town...it starts to to get boring. the problem with interactive filmmaking with multiple POVs that let user define it themselves is that it puts too much control in the users hand. they will not be able to create an editorial experience that matches one that was labored over for weeks and months. when there is no clear objective to accomplish with a interactive experience the experience soon becomes like wandering around in a ghost town…it starts to to get boring.

]]> By: Shalendrahttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34413 Shalendra Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:59:51 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34413 Sorry for the bad spelling. Whenever I get a creative idea I kinda like to get it down on paper and correct myself later. Sorry again for my badly spelled first post here at Motiongrapher. Sorry for the bad spelling. Whenever I get a creative idea I kinda like to get it down on paper and correct myself later. Sorry again for my badly spelled first post here at Motiongrapher.

]]> By: Shalendrahttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34412 Shalendra Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:56:55 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34412 The video was okay, but I was thinking this maybe a new way of creative if the process was refined for web3D. Think about it for a second. You have 3d info from all angles of Radiohead (pretty good details considering it's all vector dots). In a Tv format where the angle is locked down, it's really kinda dull after a while, but image if you were to take the vector tracking data and put it in a Flash interactive movie. Being able for a user to watch a video (and it's effects) in any angle (or zoom in and out) in real time. Push the tech a little further and you have music videos that have user interaction and envirnoment. Kinda like, "hmm U'm bored with looking at the main singer, let me check out the drummer, or the mosh pit in the audience in the video". Now that would be freaking cool. I know. I know. "too much tracking data for the web to handle". etc etc... but remember how far the web and computers have come in the last 10 to 20 years. The limitations will eventually be removed as technology advances. When that day comes, a video like this maybe seen as one of th pioneering videos for interactive music videos. Just a thought. The video was okay, but I was thinking this maybe a new way of creative if the process was refined for web3D.

Think about it for a second. You have 3d info from all angles of Radiohead (pretty good details considering it’s all vector dots). In a Tv format where the angle is locked down, it’s really kinda dull after a while, but image if you were to take the vector tracking data and put it in a Flash interactive movie.

Being able for a user to watch a video (and it’s effects) in any angle (or zoom in and out) in real time.

Push the tech a little further and you have music videos that have user interaction and envirnoment. Kinda like, “hmm U’m bored with looking at the main singer, let me check out the drummer, or the mosh pit in the audience in the video”.

Now that would be freaking cool.

I know. I know. “too much tracking data for the web to handle”. etc etc… but remember how far the web and computers have come in the last 10 to 20 years. The limitations will eventually be removed as technology advances.

When that day comes, a video like this maybe seen as one of th pioneering videos for interactive music videos.

Just a thought.

]]> By: sting_is_gayhttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34407 sting_is_gay Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:48:49 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34407 this effect is soooooo eighties. i mean c'mon guys, move on! this effect is soooooo eighties. i mean c’mon guys, move on!

]]> By: Bleiphttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34384 Bleip Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:19:59 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34384 I don't get how these bands are even comparable. They are completely different. I don’t get how these bands are even comparable. They are completely different.

]]> By: xpez2000http://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34354 xpez2000 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:17:52 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34354 I suggest you check your video art history books... http://www.audiovisualizers.com/toolshak/vidsynth/ruttetra/ruttetra.htm I suggest you check your video art history books…

http://www.audiovisualizers.com/toolshak/vidsynth/ruttetra/ruttetra.htm

]]> By: xpez2000http://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34353 xpez2000 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:14:16 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34353 For this video to be a complete success. We will need to see the same shit in everyones reel on the far left in the coming months... Just a matter of time..... For this video to be a complete success.

We will need to see the same shit in everyones reel on the far left in the coming months…

Just a matter of time…..

]]> By: mehttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34351 me Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:51:06 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34351 Of course the glove rocks. Billy Jean is classic... Of course the glove rocks. Billy Jean is classic…

]]> By: wiremuhttp://motionographer.com/2008/07/14/no-lights-no-camera-action/comment-page-1/#comment-34342 wiremu Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:59:47 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=3909#comment-34342 oh yeah, I saw you...did you check out those new staples they have in now? oh yeah, I saw you…did you check out those new staples they have in now?

]]>