<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crush and REM Strike Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/</link>
	<description>Motionographer shares the best in design and moving media, from student work to feature films.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:29:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Mills</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34880</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34880</guid>
		<description>Beautiful work, but individual credits to each of the artists who clearly worked hard on this might show them a bit more respect.

Corporatizing the collected efforts of hard working artists is kind of like seeing a curator take credit for an artists&#039; work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful work, but individual credits to each of the artists who clearly worked hard on this might show them a bit more respect.</p>
<p>Corporatizing the collected efforts of hard working artists is kind of like seeing a curator take credit for an artists&#8217; work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomorrowisclosed</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34461</link>
		<dc:creator>tomorrowisclosed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34461</guid>
		<description>totally agree with you andy. its shooting fish in a barrel really this wild criticism behind a greyed out name. reminds me of the sort of people who call up poll lines marked &#039;yes&#039;, &#039;no&#039;, and &#039;don&#039;t know&#039;, and say &#039;i don&#039;t know&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally agree with you andy. its shooting fish in a barrel really this wild criticism behind a greyed out name. reminds me of the sort of people who call up poll lines marked &#8216;yes&#8217;, &#8216;no&#8217;, and &#8216;don&#8217;t know&#8217;, and say &#8216;i don&#8217;t know&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34436</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34436</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m genuinely starting to think that this blog has become far too popular for it&#039;s own good. I definitely can&#039;t remember this level of pointless negativity (almost always by posters who lack any linkage to their own work) back in the days of Tween.

Yes, this website is indeed &quot;degrading itself every day&quot; when it puts up with a level of commentary that amounts to nothing more than snidey and almost personal attacks. There&#039;s nothing remotely intelligent, constructive or useful there, &#039;Justin Case&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m genuinely starting to think that this blog has become far too popular for it&#8217;s own good. I definitely can&#8217;t remember this level of pointless negativity (almost always by posters who lack any linkage to their own work) back in the days of Tween.</p>
<p>Yes, this website is indeed &#8220;degrading itself every day&#8221; when it puts up with a level of commentary that amounts to nothing more than snidey and almost personal attacks. There&#8217;s nothing remotely intelligent, constructive or useful there, &#8216;Justin Case&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RexHex</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34435</link>
		<dc:creator>RexHex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34435</guid>
		<description>mathagat

Will you direct us your fellow designers to your reel?

It must be a wonder to behold.  How many designs of yours have been featured on this site or any other?

Please enlighten us. We are honored and humbled at your presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mathagat</p>
<p>Will you direct us your fellow designers to your reel?</p>
<p>It must be a wonder to behold.  How many designs of yours have been featured on this site or any other?</p>
<p>Please enlighten us. We are honored and humbled at your presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34434</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34434</guid>
		<description>That song is horrid. Anyone with a rhyming dictionary and a few dozen clichés could have churned that out. &lt;strong&gt;OWW!!&lt;/strong&gt; Sorry to the REM fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That song is horrid. Anyone with a rhyming dictionary and a few dozen clichés could have churned that out. <strong>OWW!!</strong> Sorry to the REM fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triz</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34431</link>
		<dc:creator>Triz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34431</guid>
		<description>can you work on your sentence construction? It doesn&#039;t seem to be proper enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you work on your sentence construction? It doesn&#8217;t seem to be proper enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monovich</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34429</link>
		<dc:creator>monovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34429</guid>
		<description>actually, trapcode was the first thing that went through my mind when I saw all those cubes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, trapcode was the first thing that went through my mind when I saw all those cubes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34428</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34428</guid>
		<description>I think this clip is great - it is reminiscent of everybody first after effects test render but at least it doesn&#039;t look like another bloody trapcode tutorial. There&#039;s a lot going on as well, it&#039;s a lot more sophisticated than it first appears and I&#039;m really digging the lo-fi trashy aesthetic. No lens flares = awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this clip is great &#8211; it is reminiscent of everybody first after effects test render but at least it doesn&#8217;t look like another bloody trapcode tutorial. There&#8217;s a lot going on as well, it&#8217;s a lot more sophisticated than it first appears and I&#8217;m really digging the lo-fi trashy aesthetic. No lens flares = awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34427</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34427</guid>
		<description>@mark. i totally agree with you but what did you think about the graphics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mark. i totally agree with you but what did you think about the graphics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://motionographer.com/2008/07/18/crush_rem_02/comment-page-1/#comment-34426</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=3941#comment-34426</guid>
		<description>I can remember doing this sort of stuff when i was at uni, i dont really understand whats so different about this, people were churning this stuff out all the time in the early nineties. harsh but true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can remember doing this sort of stuff when i was at uni, i dont really understand whats so different about this, people were churning this stuff out all the time in the early nineties. harsh but true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
