Comments on: Dvein: F5 Titles http://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss Motionographer shares the best in moving media, from student work to feature films. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tavohttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38190 tavo Sun, 03 May 2009 22:38:36 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38190 wow!! they are the fucking chief! Congratulations! wow!! they are the fucking chief! Congratulations!

]]> By: kabirkashyaphttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38171 kabirkashyap Fri, 01 May 2009 06:06:04 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38171 Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't these titles meant for the audience? And as a member of the audience I am obviously not aware of any backstory - i.e. things that inspire the speakers. So all I can do is appreciate the visual beauty (10/10 for that), without much meaning attached to the whole experience. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but aren’t these titles meant for the audience? And as a member of the audience I am obviously not aware of any backstory – i.e. things that inspire the speakers. So all I can do is appreciate the visual beauty (10/10 for that), without much meaning attached to the whole experience.

]]> By: r3awak3nhttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38166 r3awak3n Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:32:42 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38166 DVEIN never disapoints! DVEIN never disapoints!

]]> By: pjhttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38154 pj Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:37:00 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38154 if thats the case then its completely out of context to watch this in any other scenario but before seeing the speakers speak then? I think what I am reacting to is other titles they have done where they kept the medium somewhat the same to keep it cohesive while still abstract and elegant. Just preference i suppose if thats the case then its completely out of context to watch this in any other scenario but before seeing the speakers speak then? I think what I am reacting to is other titles they have done where they kept the medium somewhat the same to keep it cohesive while still abstract and elegant. Just preference i suppose

]]> By: dieLAMBhttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38153 dieLAMB Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:22:08 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38153 I get where you're coming from. However, by nature titles are not linear narrative pieces. They are visual/visceral supplements to what they precede. Films speak for themselves -- not necessarily titles. The speakers were asked to pick inspirational objects. As a prequel to the talks, these images were loose teases to what the talks might divulge. The ambiguity in these objects makes the viewer want to see the talks and maybe find out a bit more the person/people that the objects represented. I get where you’re coming from. However, by nature titles are not linear narrative pieces. They are visual/visceral supplements to what they precede. Films speak for themselves — not necessarily titles.

The speakers were asked to pick inspirational objects. As a prequel to the talks, these images were loose teases to what the talks might divulge. The ambiguity in these objects makes the viewer want to see the talks and maybe find out a bit more the person/people that the objects represented.

]]> By: Douglashttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38149 Douglas Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:45:19 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38149 agree w/ pj. agree w/ pj.

]]> By: pjhttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38147 pj Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:03:31 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38147 ha reasonable point but what happened to the work speaking for itself? ha reasonable point but what happened to the work speaking for itself?

]]> By: Charles Leehttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38146 Charles Lee Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:37:48 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38146 Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't F5 all about "Inspiration"?? Have another read of the write up above. Ties in with each speaker pretty damn well I'd say. Obviously we don't know the answers each person gave, but if Dvein did what they said, then its pretty straight forward of a concept or as they called it a multiple collaboration. Amazing work! Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t F5 all about “Inspiration”?? Have another read of the write up above. Ties in with each speaker pretty damn well I’d say. Obviously we don’t know the answers each person gave, but if Dvein did what they said, then its pretty straight forward of a concept or as they called it a multiple collaboration.

Amazing work!

]]> By: garin2http://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38145 garin2 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:36:49 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38145 teo/fernando great job as always! teo/fernando

great job as always!

]]> By: pjhttp://motionographer.com/2009/04/29/dvein-f5-titles/comment-page-1/#comment-38143 pj Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:13:14 +0000 http://motionographer.com/?p=13406#comment-38143 I'll prob. get some heat for this comment, but where this is beautiful to watch in terms of how its shot/rendered, Im not following how it ties into anything or anyone from an idea stand point. Even if abstract in intention it seemed a little all over the place but executed well. I’ll prob. get some heat for this comment, but where this is beautiful to watch in terms of how its shot/rendered, Im not following how it ties into anything or anyone from an idea stand point. Even if abstract in intention it seemed a little all over the place but executed well.

]]>