<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: F5 RE:PLAY Film Festival: Batch Three</title> <atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link> <description>Motionographer shares the best in moving media, from student work to feature films.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: becundo</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/comment-page-1/#comment-38510</link> <dc:creator>becundo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=15109#comment-38510</guid> <description>i was so much waiting for this one!
thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was so much waiting for this one!<br
/> thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: swimtwobirds</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/comment-page-1/#comment-38509</link> <dc:creator>swimtwobirds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:00:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=15109#comment-38509</guid> <description>mmmm. ok.
duly noted, and god knows more than I knew about the acetone!
still tho; while i realise this is, in effect, a technique bonmot.. presenting moody white san serif disintegrating against sympathetically photographed backgrounds is, to be fair, something everyone has seen quite a lot of?
anyway - don&#039;t mean to be snarky, do realise they&#039;re all up in the gods as it were..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmm. ok.<br
/> duly noted, and god knows more than I knew about the acetone!<br
/> still tho; while i realise this is, in effect, a technique bonmot.. presenting moody white san serif disintegrating against sympathetically photographed backgrounds is, to be fair, something everyone has seen quite a lot of?<br
/> anyway &#8211; don&#8217;t mean to be snarky, do realise they&#8217;re all up in the gods as it were..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg Herman</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/comment-page-1/#comment-38508</link> <dc:creator>Greg Herman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:46:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=15109#comment-38508</guid> <description>I agree,  Very cinematic and cool! Great job on all 3 of those.
I really admire and love this type of work.  Stuff that is created for the passion of telling the story, and not because your selling a product. Wish more companies would do more of this type of thing.  Stretch out there creativity and make more internal stuff that is not product related.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree,  Very cinematic and cool! Great job on all 3 of those.<br
/> I really admire and love this type of work.  Stuff that is created for the passion of telling the story, and not because your selling a product. Wish more companies would do more of this type of thing.  Stretch out there creativity and make more internal stuff that is not product related.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bleb</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/comment-page-1/#comment-38507</link> <dc:creator>bleb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=15109#comment-38507</guid> <description>Yep, you&#039;re wrong.  I think this film is ethereal and lovely.  There were no budgets for any of the pieces and this execution was simply elegant photography with a nice typographic effect.
For the record, the Ice Storm looks like it was created with practical optical effects (likely prisms) while this one seemed to be created with an ink-in-acetone-bath technique.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you&#8217;re wrong.  I think this film is ethereal and lovely.  There were no budgets for any of the pieces and this execution was simply elegant photography with a nice typographic effect.</p><p>For the record, the Ice Storm looks like it was created with practical optical effects (likely prisms) while this one seemed to be created with an ink-in-acetone-bath technique.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: swimtwobirds</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2009/06/05/f5-replay-film-festival-batch-three/comment-page-1/#comment-38506</link> <dc:creator>swimtwobirds</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=15109#comment-38506</guid> <description>is it wrong to say that the imaginary forces one feels incredibly lazy? I mean, in essence they submitted the ice storm titles from bureau and those titles are twelve years old now..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it wrong to say that the imaginary forces one feels incredibly lazy? I mean, in essence they submitted the ice storm titles from bureau and those titles are twelve years old now..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
