<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Alaska Nanooks 2010 Hockey Intro</title> <atom:link href="http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link> <description>Motionographer shares the best in moving media, from student work to feature films.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: gabriel</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41242</link> <dc:creator>gabriel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:28:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41242</guid> <description>For a self-aware piece of shtick, I think it&#039;s pulled off well in consideration of the intended context. Wrap those polar bears in American flags, and this would be Stephen Colbert&#039;s favorite hockey team.
I can&#039;t help but wonder if the proper licenses were obtained for the copyrighted music? And if so, is the fee reduced for an educational institution? Or is it waived entirely.
I inquire because I have been approached in the past by an educational institution to do work that included requests for copyrighted music. My inclination is that the license fees would exceed a typical state institutional budget. Is this an accurate assumption? Are there fee waivers for an educational institution?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a self-aware piece of shtick, I think it&#8217;s pulled off well in consideration of the intended context. Wrap those polar bears in American flags, and this would be Stephen Colbert&#8217;s favorite hockey team.</p><p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the proper licenses were obtained for the copyrighted music? And if so, is the fee reduced for an educational institution? Or is it waived entirely.</p><p>I inquire because I have been approached in the past by an educational institution to do work that included requests for copyrighted music. My inclination is that the license fees would exceed a typical state institutional budget. Is this an accurate assumption? Are there fee waivers for an educational institution?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Clay</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41161</link> <dc:creator>Joe Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41161</guid> <description>I know it&#039;s meant to be fun, but I can&#039;t suspend disbelief when an F-16 is able to fly in space. Also, if you&#039;re going to reference Top Gun, perhaps you should get the plane correct. Why does this even go into space and yet back into the arena?
Most of these end up somewhat cheesy, but this one is just insane. I will say, however, that I liked the opening shot with the Aurora Borealis.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s meant to be fun, but I can&#8217;t suspend disbelief when an F-16 is able to fly in space. Also, if you&#8217;re going to reference Top Gun, perhaps you should get the plane correct. Why does this even go into space and yet back into the arena?</p><p>Most of these end up somewhat cheesy, but this one is just insane. I will say, however, that I liked the opening shot with the Aurora Borealis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seps</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41146</link> <dc:creator>seps</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41146</guid> <description>same here, this piece should be removed from the main list... tecnically it is just ok, the &quot;concept&quot; is just ridiculous...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same here, this piece should be removed from the main list&#8230; tecnically it is just ok, the &#8220;concept&#8221; is just ridiculous&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NoiZzy</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41139</link> <dc:creator>NoiZzy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:07:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41139</guid> <description>i definatly agree with Aplayer, this article shouldnt be on motionographer at all. Feel like motionographer is getting too big and it feels on the content... too bad..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i definatly agree with Aplayer, this article shouldnt be on motionographer at all. Feel like motionographer is getting too big and it feels on the content&#8230; too bad..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: aplayer</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41133</link> <dc:creator>aplayer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41133</guid> <description>Can someone tell me why this is a main article? when there is a lot of other good work just shown as a quickie? Or am I missing something?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone tell me why this is a main article? when there is a lot of other good work just shown as a quickie? Or am I missing something?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: monovich</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41122</link> <dc:creator>monovich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:44:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41122</guid> <description>Well its a good effort and has some good moments, but to me its like trying to make Napoleon Dynamite II: Better to not even try.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well its a good effort and has some good moments, but to me its like trying to make Napoleon Dynamite II: Better to not even try.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tiagoss</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41121</link> <dc:creator>tiagoss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:48:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41121</guid> <description>sorry if it&#039;s your home team &quot;gabreal&quot;, but this video looks like it&#039;s made to &quot;boost&quot; drunk retards before a game, for something made in 09/10 it could look waaaay better then this, with so much good guys working in this area
p.s. i understand the interviews with Sarah Palin now</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry if it&#8217;s your home team &#8220;gabreal&#8221;, but this video looks like it&#8217;s made to &#8220;boost&#8221; drunk retards before a game, for something made in 09/10 it could look waaaay better then this, with so much good guys working in this area</p><p>p.s. i understand the interviews with Sarah Palin now</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mathagat</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41101</link> <dc:creator>mathagat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:50:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41101</guid> <description>rad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc B.</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41098</link> <dc:creator>Marc B.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:09:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41098</guid> <description>Finally a piece I can relate to.
Palin 2012!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a piece I can relate to.</p><p>Palin 2012!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gabreal</title><link>http://motionographer.com/2010/01/20/alaska-nanooks-2010-hockey-intro/comment-page-1/#comment-41090</link> <dc:creator>gabreal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://motionographer.com/?p=24762#comment-41090</guid> <description>Hell yeah! thats my home town team!  Knowing a number of UAF hockey players growing up this ridiculous video captures their mentality perfectly...at least after a few beers around a palette fire listening to music blasting from big trucks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell yeah! thats my home town team!  Knowing a number of UAF hockey players growing up this ridiculous video captures their mentality perfectly&#8230;at least after a few beers around a palette fire listening to music blasting from big trucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
